Bennett McCallum told "my" Kuroda story a decade ago
From to time I will make an argument and then later realize that it really wasn't my own independently thought out argument, but rather a "reproduction" of something I once read. Often it would be Milton Friedman who has been my inspiration, however, Friedman is certainly not my only inspiration. Another economist who undoubtedly have had quite a bit of an influence on my thinking is Bennett McCallum and guess what - it turns out that the argument that I was making in my latest post on the "Kuroda recovery" is very similar to the type of argument Bennett made in a number of papers around a decade ago about how to get Japan out of the deflationary trap. Bennett has kindly pointed this out to me. I know Bennett's work on Japan quite well, but when I was writing my post yesterday I didn't realize how close my thinking was to Bennett's arguments. I therefore think it is appropriate to touch on some of Bennett's main conclusions and how they relate to the situation in Japan today. I my previous post I argued that easing of monetary policy in Japan would primarily work through an increase in domestic demand - contrary to the general perception that monetary easing would primarily boost exports through a depreciation of the yen. Bennett told the exact same story a decade ago in his paper "Japanese Monetary Policy, 1991–2001" (and a number of other papers). While I used general historical observations to make my argument Bennett in his 2003 paper uses a formal model. His model is a variation of an open economy DSGE model calibrated for the Japanese economy originally developed with Edward Nelson. In his paper Bennett simulates a shock to inflation expectations - from -1% inflation to +1% inflation. Hence, this is not very different from the actual shock we are presently seeing in Japan. However, while the "Kuroda-shock" is a direct shock to the money base in Bennett's example the exchange rate is used as the policy instrument. However, this is not really important for the results in the model (as far as I can see at least...). In Bennett's model the Bank of Japan is buying foreign assets to weaken the yen to increase inflation expectations. According to the general perception this should lead to an marked improvement Japanese net exports. However, take a look at what conclusion Bennett reaches:
The variable on whose response we shall focus is the home country’s— i.e., Japan’s—net export balance in real terms....we see that the upward jump in the target inﬂation rate (π), which occurs in period 1, does indeed induce an exchange-rate depreciation rate that remains positive for over two years. Inflation, not surprisingly, rises and stays above its initial value for over two years, then oscillates and settles down at a new steady state rate of 0.005 (in relation to its starting value). Quite surprisingly, p responds more strongly than s so the real exchange rate appreciates. As expected, however, real output rises strongly for two years. Most importantly, the real (Japanese) export balance is so affected by the two-year increase in real output that it turns negative and stays negative for almost two years.Hence, Bennett's simulations shows the same result as i postulated in my previous post - that monetary easing even if it leads to a substantial weakening of the yen will primarily boost domestic demand. In fact it is likely that after a few quarters the boost to domestic demand will lead to higher import growth than export growth and hence the net impact on the Japanese trade balance is likely to be negative. Said, in another way there is no beggar-thy-neighbor-effect. In fact is anything monetary easing in Japan is likely to boost exports to Japan rather than the opposite. I am sure that Bennett's papers also in the future will inspire me to write blog posts on different topics as anybody who follow my blog knows it has done in the past - even when I don't realize myself to begin with. Until then I suggest to my readers that you take a look at Bennett's 2003 paper. It will teach you quite a bit about what is happening in Japan a decade after Bennett wrote the paper.