Jens Weidmann, do you remember the second pillar?

Jens Weidmann, do you remember the second pillar?
Today the ECB is very eager to stress it's 2% inflation target. However, a couple of years ago the ECB in fact had two targets - the so-called two pillars of monetary policy. The one was the inflation target and the other was a money supply target - the so-called reference value for the growth rate of M3. The second pillar in many ways made a lot of sense - at least as a instrument for monetary analysis. The second pillar was put into the ECB tool box by the Bundesbank which insisted that monetary analysis was as important as a pure inflation target. Read for example former ECB chief economist and Bundesbanker Otmar Issing's defense of the two-pillar set-up here. The starting point for calculating the reference value for M3 was the equation of exchange: (1) MV=PY or in growth rates: (2) m+v=p+y (2) of course can be re-written to: (2)' m=p+y-v If we assume trend real GDP growth (y) is 2% you can calculate the reference value for m that will ensure 2% inflation over the medium term. You of course also have to make an assumption about velocity. ECB used to think that trend growth in v was -0.5 to -1%. This give us the following reference growth rate for M3 (m-target): (3) m-target=2+2-(-1)=5% (4.5% if you assume velocity growth of -0.5%) Said in another way if the ECB keeps M3 growing at 5% year-in and year-out then inflation should be around 2% in the medium term. An yes, this is of course exactly what Milton Friedman recommend long ago. 2.5% M3 growth is hardly inflationary Today we got the latest M3 numbers for the euro zone. The calvinists should be happy - M3 decelerated sharply to 2.5% y/y in April. Half of what should be the reference growth rate for M3 - and that is ignoring the fact that velocity has collapsed. What does that tells us about the inflationary risks in the euro zone? Well, there are no inflationary risks - there are only deflationary risks. Using the assumptions above we can calculate the long-term inflation if M3 keeps growing by 2.5% - from (2)' we get the following: (4) p=m-y+v (4)' p=2.5-2+(-1)=-0.5% So it is official! Monetary analysis as it used to be conducted in the Bundesbank is telling you that we are going to have deflation in the euro zone in the medium term! And don't tell me about monetary overhang - the ECB is in the business of letting bygones be bygones (otherwise the ECB would target the NGDP LEVEL or the price LEVEL) and by the way the ECB spend lots of time in 2004-7 to explain why money supply growth overshot the target. Jens Weidmann - monetarist or calvinist? The Bundesbank brought in monetary analysis and a money supply focus to the ECB so I think it is only fair to ask whether Bundesbank chief Jens Weidmann still believe in monetary analysis? If he is true to the strong monetarist traditions at the Bundesbank then he should come out forcefully in favour of monetary easing to ensure M3 growth of at least 5% - in fact it should be much higher as velocity has collapsed, but at least to bring M3 back to 5% would be a start. I hope the Bundesbank will soon refind it's monetarist traditions...please make Milton Friedman and Karl Brunner proud! PS I of course still want the ECB to introduce a NGDP level target, but less would make me happy - a 5-10% target range for M3 (the range prior to the crisis) and a minimum price on European inflation linked bonds would would clearly be enough to at least avoid collapse.


WORLD LEADING ADVISORY SPECIALISING IN THIS TOPIC

GET NEWSLETTER

Sign up now to receive the latest blog posts and news about our research.