Lorenzo´s Socratic dialogue on NGDP Targeting

Lorenzo´s Socratic dialogue on NGDP Targeting
Lorenzo from Oz suggested the following "Socratic dialogue "on NGDP targeting in a comment to my previous post - I think it is so good it need to be repeated: Q: What has caused more damage; entrenched inflation (the 1970s) or massive deflation (1929-32)? A: Deflation. But that is not what we face. Q: What has caused more damage; entrenched inflation (the 1970s) or unexpected disinflation during a leveraging crunch (2008-?). A: But inflation is evil. Q: Why is inflation bad? A: Because it distorts private decisions. Q: Does it do that making basic parameters for judgement unreliable? A: Yes. Q: So it is about creating a clear and reliable framing for private decisions? A: Yes. Q: So, a central bank should provide a reliable framework for private decisions? A: Yes. Q: So it is about framing expectations in a credible way? A: Yes. Q: So, what is more important to people, expectations about income or expectations about prices? A: [Some obfustication] Q: So, should not a central bank seek to credibly generate expectations about income? A. [Some more obfustication] Q: In a highly leveraged age with many wages set by contracts operating across time and a range of “sticky” prices, which is more important to people, expectations about money income or “real” income? A. [Even more obfustication] Q: So, would not a clear target about aggregate income (aka NGDP aka Py) create a framework to anchor expectations in what people actually care about? A: [Meltdown] PS off to Vilnius, Lithuania today - nice city and nice people. I am among other things having a presentation about 1931 vs 2011 - and more important about whether 2012 will bring the same horrors as 1932 (My answer is - I fear so, but it is not too late to avoid).


WORLD LEADING ADVISORY SPECIALISING IN THIS TOPIC

GET NEWSLETTER

Sign up now to receive the latest blog posts and news about our research.