"Meantime people wrangle about fiscal remedies"
The other day I wrote a piece about the risks of introducing politics (particularly fiscal policy) into the central bank's reaction function. I used the example of the ECB, but now it seems like I should have given a bit more attention to the Federal Reserve as Fed chief Bernanke yesterday said the follow:
“Monetary policy is not a panacea, it would be much better to have a broad-based policy effort addressing a whole variety of issues...I’d be much more comfortable if, in fact, Congress would take some of this burden from us and address those issues.”So what is Bernanke saying - well he sounds like a Keynesian who believes that we are in a liquidity trap and that monetary policy is inefficient. It is near-tragic that Bernanke uses the exact same wording as Bundesbank chief Jens Weidmann used recently (See here). While Bernanke is a keynesian Weidmann is a calvinist. Bernanke wants looser fiscal policy - Weidmann wants fiscal tightening. However, what they both have in common is that they are central bankers who apparently don't think that nominal GDP is determined by monetary policy. Said, in another other way they say that nominal stability is not the responsibility of the central bank. You can then wonder what they then think central banks can do. What both Weidmann and Bernanke effectively are saying is that they can not do anymore. They are out of ammunition. This is the good old "pushing on a string" excuse for monetary in-action. This is of course nonsense. The central bank can determine whatever level for nominal GDP it wants. Just ask Gedeon Gono. It is incredible that we four years into this mess still have central bankers from the biggest central banks in the world who are making the same mistakes as central bankers did during the Great Depression. Yesterday Scott Sumner quoted Viscount d’Abernon who in 1931 said:
"This depression is the stupidest and most gratuitous in history!...The explanation of our anomalous situation...is that the machinery for handling and distributing the product of labor has proved inadequate. The means of payment provided by currency and credit have fallen so short of the amount required by increased production that a general fall in prices has ensued...This has not only caused a disturbance in the relations between buyer and seller, but has gravely aggravated the situation between debtor and creditor. The gold standard, which was adopted with a view to obtaining stability of price, has failed in its main function. In the meantime people wrangle about fiscal remedies and similar devices of secondary importance, neglecting the essential question of stability in standard of value...The situation could be remedied within a month by joint action of the principal gold-using countries through the taking of necessary steps by the central banks.”It is tragic that the same day Scott quotes d’Abernon Ben Bernanke "wrangles about fiscal remedies". Bernanke of course full well knows that the impact on nominal GDP and prices of fiscal policy depends 100% on actions of the Federal Reserve. Fiscal policy does not determine the level of NGDP - monetary policy determines NGDP (Remember MV=PY!). The Great Depression was caused by monetary policy failure and so was the Great Recession (See here and here). In the 1930s the Lords of Finance Montagu, Norman, Meyer, Moret, Stringher, Hijikata and Schacht were all wrangling about fiscal remedies and defended their failed monetary policies. Today the New Lords of Finance Bernanke, Shirakawa, Draghi and Weidmann are doing the same thng. How little we - or rather central bankers - have learned in 80 years... UPDATE: Maybe our New Lords of Finance should read this Easy Guide to Monetary Policy.