ALL BLOG POSTS
We nearly got what Market Monetarists have been asking for - the Federal Reserve now have a relatively clear defined target and it will implement it through changes to the money base (by buying Mortgage backed securities). It is not a NGDP level target, but probably more a light version of the Mankiw rule or the so-called Evans rule.
This week has been nearly 100% about monetary policy in the financial markets and in the international financial media. In fact since 2008 monetary policy has been the main driver of prices in basically all asset classes. In the markets the main job of investors is to guess what the ECB or the Federal Reserve will do next. However, the problem is that there is tremendous uncertainty about what the central banks will do and this uncertainty is multi-dimensional. Hence, the question is not only whether XYZ central bank will ease monetary policy or not, but also about how it will do it.
I am a huge fan of Cato-Unbound.org. Here you find good insightful and intellectual debates amount classical liberal, libertarian and conservative scholars on a number of topics. The quality of the pieces on Cato Unbound is always very high. That is also the case for the latest "debate". As always there is a "Lead Essay" and a number of "Response Essays". This time the topic is "Theory and Practice in the Austrian School".
Some time ago Scott Sumner did a number of blog posts on fiscal policy and why he believes that the budget multiplier is zero. At the time I was somewhat frustrated that the amount of time Scott was using to focus on an issue that I found quite obvious. However, I now found myself doing exactly the same thing - I can't let go of the game played by central banks against governments and impact this has on the economic policy mix. This is maybe because I find empirical evidence for the so-called Sumner Critique popping up everywhere.
The main founding fathers of monetarism to me always was Milton Friedman, Anna Schwartz, Karl Brunner, Allan Meltzer and David Laidler. The three first have all now passed away and Allan Meltzer to some extent seems to have abandoned monetarism. However, David Laidler is still going strong and maintains his monetarist views. David has just published a new and very interesting paper - "Two Crises, Two Ideas and One Question" - in which he compares the Great Depression and the Great Recession through the lens of history of economic thought.
I am still in Russia and do not have much time to blog, but something have been on my mind in the last couple if days. Where did the ECB's monetary pillar go? In the "old days" the ECB was hugely focused on what was happening to M3 growth. The ECB would talk about it reference value for M3 growth and it would analyse both the nominal and the real "money gap" to assess future inflationary (or deflationary) pressures. This of course to a large extent was the "darling" of then ECB chief economist Otmar Issing. However, Issing is no longer with the ECB and apparently monetary analysis has disappeared from the ECB with him - at least gradually.
I have long been impressed with the young guard at George Mason University. Now two of them - Alex Salter and Will Luther - is out with a new Working Paper - "Synthesizing State and Spontaneous Order Theories of Money". It is very interesting stuff and I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in monetary theory. Here is the abstract: